![]() |
||||||||
:: home overview political affairs relief, recovery & reconstruction additional themes human rights gender security sector a historical perspective |
|
|||||||
|
UNAMA plays a key role in promoting more coherent international engagement in Afghanistan; supporting regional cooperation in the context of the Afghanistan Compact; promoting humanitarian coordination; and contributing to human rights protection and promotion, including monitoring the situation of civilians in the armed conflict. The political mandate of UNAMA supported the implementation of the institutional and political objectives of the Bonn Agreement, signed in November 2001, as well as a range of peace-building tasks and currently includes: Background to UNAMA The key aspects of the political mandate of UNAMA include support for the implementation of the institutional and political objectives of the Bonn Agreement, as well as a range of peace-building tasks:
And, where necessary:
The implementation of the institutional and political objectives of the Bonn Agreement throughout the transitional period include the following institutional steps:
Bonn
Agreement The Constitutional Loya Jirga was successfully concluded on 4 January 2004 with a nearly unanimous agreement among the 502 delegates on the final draft. In view of the many controversial issues that emerged and nearly paralysed the assembly in its final days, this agreement represented a significant achievement. Ultimately the various groups showed the political maturity needed to set aside the most divisive claims and reach a compromise on many of their remaining differences. The issues in question included the specific powers of the President, the nationality of ministers, the creation of a commission to oversee the implementation of the constitution, the timing of the elections, and the national anthem and language. The compromise achieved between the proponents of presidential and parliamentary forms of government led to a system that is presidential in nature, but with a large degree of parliamentary oversight. For the first time in the constitutional history of Afghanistan, the definition of the nation explicitly included all minority groups. Languages other than Dari and Pashto were recognized as official in areas where they are spoken by a majority. The constitution enshrined equality of men and women and promoted women’s political participation by guaranteeing that at least 25 per cent of representatives in the lower house of parliament (Wolesi Jirga) will be women. The constitution provides a framework for the establishment of the rule of law consistent with the beliefs and prescriptions of Islam. The positive outcome of the Constitutional Loya Jirga bolstered the political dynamics of the nation. The Security Council had been repeatedly informed of the concern that a continued sense of alienation in southern Afghanistan was a factor of instability. In contrast to the fragmentation observed in the past, however, delegates from the southern provinces demonstrated a sense of unity and purpose indicative of a renewed interest and optimism for national politics within that important constituency. This development in particular represented a welcome perception that the new constitution would offer a credible framework for power sharing. The
difficult task of implementation now lay ahead. The new constitutional
framework would have meaning for the citizens of Afghanistan only if it
translated into improvements in security, governance and welfare. On 8 July 2004, the Chairman of the United Nations-Afghan Joint Electoral Management Body (JEMB) — the independent commission mandated to conduct and supervise Afghanistan’s electoral process — formally announced that the presidential election would be held on 9 October and parliamentary elections would be held in the Afghan month of Saur (20 April-20 May) 2005. While legal and technical difficulties provided a sufficient case for delaying and separating the elections, the JEMB also noted widespread concern in Afghanistan about the lack of disarmament and the fear that this could prejudice the conduct and outcome of the parliamentary elections. It therefore called upon the Government and the international community to continue and intensify, ahead of the presidential and parliamentary elections, efforts to strengthen the national armed forces and achieve broader disarmament, in order to create a safer and more open environment for candidates and voters. The presidential election, which was contested by 18 candidates, including one woman, was held on schedule on 9 October 2004. Despite fears that the process might be targeted by anti-Government elements, no major security incidents occurred. A number of opposition candidates, however, raised serious allegations regarding the fairness of the process, including problems with the use of indelible ink to mark voters’ thumbs and assertions of undue influence on voters by polling staff and candidates’ representatives. Midway through the polling, those opposition candidates issued an appeal for voters to boycott the ballot. The boycott was largely ignored by voters: 8,128,940 ballots were cast, representing 70 per cent of registered voters. Forty per cent of voters were women. Polling also took place in Pakistan and the Islamic Republic of Iran, where more than 580,000 and 240,000 Afghan refugees, respectively, voted. Some 5,321 domestic and 121 international observers and monitors, 22,000 party agents and 52,000 agents of candidates, as well as national and international media, followed the proceedings. In the days after the ballot, most of the candidates who had called for a boycott continued to allege serious irregularities and demanded that some polling centres be reopened and that their complaints be investigated by an independent panel. While the JEMB disallowed any further polling, it did request UNAMA to nominate an independent panel of international electoral experts to investigate complaints. The panel’s report to the JEMB, which was made public on 2 November, found that the irregularities observed did not have a material impact on the overall outcome of the election. President Karzai won the election with 55.4 per cent of the vote. He was followed by Yonous Qanooni, with 16.3 per cent; Haji Mohammad Mohaqeq, with 11.6 per cent; and Abdul Rashid Dostum, with 10 per cent. The remaining 14 candidates each received less than 2 per cent of the votes, and collectively 6 per cent. The candidates ultimately agreed to accept the election results. A preliminary analysis of the final election results suggested that, as was the case with the Constitutional Loya Jirga, the assertion of ethnic identity played an important role. Electoral support for the four main contenders, President Karzai, Mr. Qanooni, Mr. Dostum and Mr. Mohaqeq, strongly correlated with the rural areas in which Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazaras are, respectively, the majority groups. Ethnic considerations, however, appeared to have had less impact in major cities. This may be attributable to the fact that, since ethnic identity was not exploited aggressively during the campaign, candidates were able to operate in capitals more widely outside their core constituencies. President
Karzai, whose inauguration took place on 7 December 2004, appointed a
27-member Cabinet on 23 December 2004. The composition of the Cabinet
met the requirements of the Afghan constitution, and all ministers had
higher education and hold only Afghan citizenship. It also reflected broadly
the ethnic composition of the country, with ten Pashtuns, eight Tajiks,
five Hazaras, two Uzbeks, one Turkmen and one Baloch. Three women are
in the cabinet – among them the only female presidential candidate,
Masuda Jalal. Even while a fully finalized legal framwork for the ensuing electoral process remained outstanding, the JEMB established a timeline for key elements leading up to election day. Crucial among these were the periods for candidate nomination and additional voter registration. On 29 April, President Karzai issued a decree approving the revised Electoral Law. On the following day, the Candidate Nomination period began as scheduled and concluded, following an extension necessitated by security incidents and other obstacles, on 26 May. The preliminary list showed a total of 6,102 candidates registered, 10 percent of whom were women. The list would then be reviewed for candidates’ compliance with all legal and constitutional stipulations. To accommodate those not already registered, as well as those who would need to re-register, a supplemental period of Voter Registration was scheduled for 25 June to 21 July, with the exercise expected to draw between 1 and 2 million voters. In addition, a Media Commission and an Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC) were established well in advance of elections. The Media Commssion would monitor and oversee election coverage and candidates’ usage of media. The ECC would function as an independent body to adjudge offenses related to the electoral process, whether through complaints submitted by participants or pursued under its own authority. The election of Wolesi Jirga and Provincial Councils effectively marks the end of the Bonn process and gives Afghanistan a fully representative national government. As enshrined in the Constitution, 25 per cent of the Wolesi Jirga shall consist of women representatives. Each of the 34 Provincial Councils elects one member to serve in the Meshrano Jirga, the Upper House of the National Assembly; these members are joined by 17 presidential appointees. The
full Meshrano Jirga as described in the Constitution, with seats numbering
three times the number of provinces, requires additional representatives
of the District Councils, as well as Presidential appointees equal to
the number of provinces. District Council elections had to be postponed,
however, pending resolution of disputes regarding district borders in
some areas. |
||||||||
| Copyright
© United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA)
|
||||||||